Alienation, Futility, and Misunderstanding

Today I want to talk about some things related to our continuing discussion of “political discourse,” identification, our history, and our human propensity to make assumptions. That’s a lot of ground to cover, so please bear with me. I’m bound to ramble.

Let’s start with discourse and President Obama’s speech. I liked it. While I’m no fan, it did satisfy some of my craving for reason in the madness of our current national dialogue. Unlike the television pundits and some on the right, I did not have a problem at all with the setting or the tone of the crowd. Tucson gets to react however they see fit, and if they needed to release some positive energy that others interpreted as having a “pep rally” feel, so be it. His speech and my own reflection these past few days about this country, its rhetoric, and where I stand politically are weighing heavily on my mind tonight.

I know where I stand, but it’s a rough place to be, and many others don’t get it. I no longer belong to anybody. It’s a very lonely feeling. For nearly 20 years I was a happy, if ignorant, liberal. My political life really started with the Clinton election of 1992, the first election in which I could vote for president. It seemed then that everybody hated the man and his wife, both of whom I loved. I slowly backed into a defensive crouch as the decade marched on and the Clintons came under attack from nearly every quarter, even from within their own party. I did not understand then that privilege and class had a lot to do with it, nor did I understand until recently our partisan history. Once you understand those two dynamics, the Clinton years, and so much else, comes into sharp focus.

The corridors of power in Washington are full of the elite. It’s the place the very rich send talentless sons and the place the children of well-off, well-connected, but not technically rich people buy their children the right educations to get into. Certainly they held a grudge against the product of a working class family, from a single mother to boot, who had worked his way up on mere wit and charm, no credentials needed to enter their Ivy League institutions. Oh, they were happy to give him an education, but then the fucker had the gall to jump to the front of the line, in front of the babies of countless powerful people who felt it was Junior’s turn. That was easy enough to understand, and by the time Clinton left office, my political mind was mature enough to realize it.

Putting our partisan history in context took quite a bit longer, and has been much harder work. If not for 2008, I’m not sure I could have done it. I had bought the rhetoric of the left hook, line, and sinker.

I don’t anymore because the way Obama ran his campaign, from McClurkin, to the character assassination of Hillary Clinton, right on down to the attacks on Sarah Palin, was at odds with what I knew to be common liberal values. We supported gay rights and the rights of women, we were proud of our history of civil rights pursuits and working class roots, we thought every vote counted and that election rules shouldn’t change in the middle of the process just because a small group of powerful people wanted a certain candidate. 2008 upended all of that.

What that break did was free me of party affiliations forever. I never forgot that, like many Americans, I gave George W. Bush a fair shot after 9/11, and he repaid that by doing things like outing a CIA agent and taking us to war in Iraq. I wasn’t going to become a Republican, even if I could occasionally vote for one. But I couldn’t be a Democrat anymore, and after the treatment I received from liberal and progressive “friends” because I chose to honor the ideas I held and not the party I had belonged to, I couldn’t really claim identification with the left at all. This freed me up to ask a lot of questions I had not previously had the courage to ask myself.

I questioned and searched and discovered that I had been wrong about much of what I’d previously thought. I had an understanding of many things that had to be questioned, and not just about the current political climate. I had certain ideas about history that needed to be challenged as well.

I thought the New Deal, for example, was a brilliant liberal achievement that was just awesome for everybody but the wealthy. I also thought the Civil War was fought by noble Republicans who acted with 19th century poise. Naïve, I know.  So I dug into that history and came to realize that for much of our history, one dominant party or another has been violently chasing the other side into a proverbial corner, until that one ascends and the whole cycle is repeated in reverse.

Republicans treated Democrats terribly after the Civil War. Democrats treated Republicans terribly during the New Deal, and even after, into the war. Republicans chased the more liberal among us for a decade with fear of communism and fascism until the boomers became young adults, and the liberal side had a political machine the likes of which had not been seen before. The Silent Majority and the Reagan revolution paid them back by building machines of their own. The cycle keeps repeating, a sickening and sad cycle of intolerance as each side seeks only to conquer and disempower the other side. It’s hopeless.

And that’s where I find myself today. Every step into enlightenment seems to bring with it more futility, more alienation. See, I’m human, and I really want to belong. Most of us do. I like to talk a good game about political independence and logical consistency, and I do value those immensely. But I’m now in an unmapped place, and there just aren’t a lot of people out here. And I think my anger over my forced disassociation from the political life I knew, as well as family and friends, hell even readers of this blog who have made assumptions about where I stand politically and have thus written me off (even though those assumptions are wrong) is partly to blame. Honestly I haven’t had the time or the inclination to correct people, so frustrated am I by the uncreativity of such thought processes. I forget I was once just as uncreative myself.

I was very surprised recently to find one of my posts being discussed on another site, a site I thought was friendly. Not only was my post being discussed negatively, the conversation was punctuated with comments about me being “too right wing” for some readers. Now, these are blog comments, so I take it with a grain of salt. And I’m aware that a lot of the people who woke up in 2008 have slipped back into an unquestioning mindset, and the equation is simple for them. I’m not bashing Sarah Palin, and I defend conservative women, even that witchy bitch Christine O’Donnell, so I must be right wing.

Fine, I never wanted that kind of audience anyway. But there were a couple of commenters who I really liked, and it was painful to see my character disparaged by them in the pile on. I steeled myself against it. My work here is important to me, and this was a case of catty faux outrage that I refused to buy into, and because I wouldn’t toe that line, I was being othered. I try not to be pulled into stuff like that, and it’s happened a lot since I started this blog. I could tell you stories about some of your favs, but I haven’t. Gossip is just as bad.

But the work can’t be important just to me. It has no place if it has no or few readers, and this blog has really died in the last year. Sometimes I feel like I’m talking to myself. So maybe I’ve miscalculated in not responding to the criticism. Maybe it hasn’t worked, this idea that if I just double down and continue being me, it’ll all work itself out. Maybe I have steeled myself into this alienation. I really want to be part of a dialogue, not writing monologues, and I guess I have to rethink how I’m doing this. But how?

One thing I’ve got to do is let go of some of the defensiveness. A lot of Americans do, and I guess it’s ironic that I find myself here again. I don’t want to be chased into a political corner, and I don’t want to chase anybody else into one either. I kind of feel I have been, and that’s led me to defensively posture my anger, as opposed to my grief, over our current state of affairs. In turn, my rhetoric has reflected this anger at times.

Grandpa used to tell me this story about his father. They lived on a little farm in Southern Indiana, two bedrooms, six children, and the parents. Mother used to walk half a mile to pail water up a hill to boil for the laundry. You get the idea. Poor, but earnest country folk. His father’s family had been registered Republican ever since the Civil War. Their family really suffered, as did the whole area, during the Depression. Suddenly the WPA opened up some job near their town, but you had to buy your own tools. His dad spent the last of their money to buy those tools, but was turned away at the job site on account of being Republican. Before he left home that day he was reported to have said that he might even vote for FDR if things all worked out.

I think often of the missed opportunity that was lost to corruption. I don’t want to be that kind of person. I don’t want to hold a grudge my whole life because of political betrayal. But I still can’t join parties. I still can’t identify with the left or the right. I see too clearly now that the left has massive problems, as massive as the right. And I also now see that not every idea emanating from the right is bad. Finally, I see that the left sometimes has good ideas, and generally says it has some values I agree with, even if it rarely actually acts upon those values and sometimes betrays them. Like I said, this is unmapped territory for me. Maybe I don’t know where I stand. Maybe there’s no chance for me to belong. I don’t want to believe that, but I’m pretty tapped for ideas.

Gosh, there’s so much more, but I have to stop. I’ve gone on too long already, and bless you if you made it this far. I’m not sure I remember why I started this essay anyway, except I was feeling reflective after Obama’s speech. I’ve talked about some things I’ve wanted to talk about for a while, but couldn’t find the context for. I guess I’m hoping I’m not alone in feeling this political alienation, futility, and misunderstanding. And I’m hoping for some creative ideas about how to move it all forward.


18 comments on “Alienation, Futility, and Misunderstanding

  1. I am in much the same place as you are, Anna Belle. It hurts to see my former allies “pile on” because I won’t bash the target of their hatred.

    I tried to listen to both Obama and Palin without a jaded ear yesterday. I was pleasantly surprised that they were calling for the same response to the Arizona shootings:

  2. BevWKY says:

    You know, guys, what you’re describing isn’t political alienation. It’s simply independence.

    Think it through.

    • That is a good point, Bev. Maybe we just have to get used to all the name calling?? I had no idea that Independents had it this rough.

    • Anna Belle says:

      Bev, I appreciate the comment, but it’s really not political independence, which I did address in the essay. It does contribute. But politics can’t happen in a vacuum. By its very nature, it can only exist where at least two people also exist. What I’m talking about is a desire to connect with people beyond the standard day-to-day tit for tat that defines our politics. What I’m looking for is a way to break through defenses and propaganda to access something real. There’s just precious little opportunity for that in our country these days.

    • Janis says:

      It’s independence Bev, but it’s also terrifying and disheartening to realize that, because I will defend ALL WOMEN from this kind of hate, I will be defended by NO WOMEN.

      I want to secede from my species.

      • BevWKY says:

        Janis, if you only knew how much, well, not hate but active disrepect I used to hold for Hillary Clinton, you wuold be amazed. Astonished, probably. Now, it’s more that I don’t agree with her politics but truly can’t stand the thought of Bill being anywhere near the White House again.

        Her, though, I have gained a lot of respect for. My point? Things do change.

        But sometimes it takes watershed events to make them happen. The last couple of years have been a crucible for women.

        And they’re not over by any means.

        In truth, I think it may just be getting started.

        • Anna Belle says:

          That was very brave of you, Bev, to acknowledge that you held an assumption that you questioned and came up with a different answer. Thank you. We need more of that boldness from both sides. I’d like to think women can lead the way on this, if only people will listen.

        • Janis says:

          I wish I were an optimist, only because it would make it easier to sleep. I can’t agree with you, Bev. I’ve seen and heard about places in this world where women are in far worse straits, and they just sit back and take it, or turn the tables on one another. Phyllis Chesler’s documented the ugly side of this quite nicely, where women cheerlead the rape of another woman, and where acid attacks are spurred on by women against women because that bitch has it coming. This is nothing compared to THAT crucible, and those places aren’t getting any better.

          I really do think this is a fundamental, engrained property of our species at this point. Women hate women more than they will ever hate a man. Feminists are no different, they are just one of a million tribes who hate the other tribes’ bitches. I’m just sick and tired of women who tolerate serial rapists with more patience and understanding than they tolerate their boyfriend’s bitch mother or their husband’s psycho ex-wife who they can like, TOTALLEE take in a cage match, beeyotch!

          It’s Bugs, Daffy, and Elmer. Men are Elmer — they’ll shoot at anything, they don’t care. The women are Bugs and Daffy, the instigators that unleash all the shotgun blasts on one another.

  3. votermom says:

    syd4’s link brought me here. I have to read your blog more often, because I’m sort of where you are, (just less informed about the history).

  4. Optixmom says:

    There was a reason why I never got involved in politics, it is too damn painful. I was always the only Pub in a sea of Dems and since I was a teenager and chose the Pub party to represent me I have been the object of ridicule in what I would otherwise call “friendly circles”. I learned to just be numb to other’s depictions of what me being a Pub represented to them.

    I was so glad to meet you this summer, AB. Even though we have followed different political paths we have had many similar experiences in our youth and adult lives. I have also lived my life as an optimist. Focusing effort on improving the lives of women of any political persuasion won’t be easy, but the rewards will ultimately come.

  5. BevWKY says:

    Anna Belle :That was very brave of you, Bev, to acknowledge that you held an assumption that you questioned and came up with a different answer. Thank you. We need more of that boldness from both sides. I’d like to think women can lead the way on this, if only people will listen.

    Brave? No, brave would be actually criticizing Hillary on one of these sites. 😉

    Which I would have no problem doing if I honestly didn’t agree with her position on something and it was on topic for whatever was being discussed. Time and place is everything.

  6. Patti says:

    I’m in the same position you are. Formerly a Democrat, but not a Republican either. 2008 really pissed me off and I can’t turn back. I just don’t talk about politics anymore, except to my poor husband, who mostly hates the subject. When it comes up at family functions, I cringe. Call me a wimp.

    That’s why I check your blog regularly, so I don’t feel so alone.

  7. Anna Belle says:

    I want to thank you all for helping me feel a little less alone in all this. It’s really helped.

    • Janis says:

      Glad to be able to provide the same assistance that you all give me. Right now I feel as if I have no “own kind.” I saw women I used to respect, people whose friendship I would have held above rubies, turn into snivelling, sneering, hateful, fawning … whatever-you-want-to-call-thems. I have literally cut off everyone I could possibly have cut off, and I don’t even talk politics with my family. I still cannot believe that a bunch of stupid Stepfords who could talk a great game before about violence against women and “rape is bad” actually didn’t believe any of it … as long as the right bitch was getting murked. I lost my entire life over 2008, and I lost my belief that I could judge character well enough to choose good friends. It caused a great deal of housecleaning in my life, and I am in no hurry to replace those “friends” with new ones, not until I know I can perform better judgments. I also lost my belief that there was ANY safety for me anywhere. I knew men would treat me like garbage, hating, wanting, lusting, sabotaging, and resenting all at the same time. Now, I can’t trust any women either. Including the ones I thought I could.

      I have a feeling they ask themselves (or have asked themselves) why I just up and vanished out of their lives and stopped contacting them completely. They don’t want to know. The explosion of anger and profanity I would unleash on them would light them on fire.

      It helps me as well to know that I do have an “own kind,” at least a small one, and in some regards.

  8. Melissa says:

    You’re definitely not alone, but I understand, it feels like it some days. I stop by your blog periodically, but sometimes I get distracted and forget. I apologize for that, because I’m usually in complete agreement. Keep your chin up.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s